iona financial solutions: fix information

iona financial solutions: fix information register new user | sign in solutions overview service-oriented architecture (soa) the value of soa iona's soa approach how soa cuts it costs where to begin top 10 soa pitfalls soa resources open source understanding open source open source solutions open source resources industry solutions telecommunications financial services government interface simulation value assessment program products overview artix artix overview artix esb artix registry/repository artix orchestration artix data services artix mainframe open source fuse esb fuse message broker fuse services framework fuse mediation router orbix orbacus white papers datasheets downloads standards services overview consulting training support open source services support overview documentation knowledge base product updates contact an engineer developer center service-oriented architecture (soa) open source orbzone mainframe library iona blogs datasheets podcasts rss feeds white papers newsletter partners overview iona partners integration partners program technology partners program ionasphere for partners become a partner customers overview by industry about iona iona at a glance news & events press releases in the news events pr image library analysts industry analyst reports and quotes analyst webcasts & podcasts ionasphere for analysts financial analysts contact iona analyst relations investors management team careers contact us home overview swiftnet fin services swiftsolutions initiatives regulatory compliance in bond trading industry trade and transaction processing related links - artix data services  datasheet - artix data services  standards libraries fix information learn about industry standards from the experts what is fix? fix message formats what about fxml? session management what are the integration issues? where to find out more   one of the key components at the heart of most stp (straight through processing) solutions in the financial markets is the ability to exchange trade information with counterparties electronically. to date most of the activity in streamlining processing has been targeted at the post trade lifecycle, namely confirmation, settlement and reconciliation. many organisations have now largely addressed this area by automating links to s.w.i.f.t., oasys global, dtcc, etc. and are now turning their attention to the front office. in order to automate the trading process an electronic standard must exist and the financial information exhange protocol (fix) has recently become the de facto standard in this area. iona, having grown out of the braid and mercator organisations, have been designing solutions and advising clients on projects involving fix for many years. we have a sound understanding of the issues surrounding the use of fix in such environments, and are therefore well placed to help our clients with its integration into an existing front and back office systems infrastructure or its implementation as part of a larger trade automation project.   what is fix? the financial interface exchange (fix) protocol was initiated in 1992 by a group of institutions and brokers interested in streamlining their trading processes. it is an open message standard controlled by no single entity, that can be structured to match the business requirements of each firm. the first organisations to go live were fidelity and salomon smith barney who still figure strongly within the fix committees. unlike most initiatives fix does not impose a single type of carrier (e.g., it will work with leased lines, private networks, internet, etc.), nor a single security protocol.  it is, however, important to note that fix is not a network in itself and that communication is made directly between each broker/institution pair by prior bi-lateral agreement. thus a fund management institution may have 50 or 60 connections to brokers worldwide some via the internet, others via direct dial or leased connections and still others connected via private networks such as liberty or autex. in summary each broker/institution connection can be thought of a two way conversational link taking place between applications at each end. these applications are often referred to as "fix engines" and can operate either as standalone or fully integrated solutions. the structure of the organisation is based around a series of committees comprised of interested parties within the broking and institutional communities. these committees are focused on business, technical and regional issues with working groups examining the impact of new technology such as xml and potential expansion of the protocol to cover other users such as exchanges and ecn's (electronic crossing networks). the protocol is defined at two levels: session and application.  the session level is concerned with the delivery of data while the application level defines business related data content. broadly the business messages cover the communication between brokers and institutions of the following information: indications of interest orders and order acknowledgment fills account allocations news, e-mail, program trading lists, administrative messages the protocol has been deliberately designed to support both domestic and cross border trading in a varied spread of instrument and security types such as: equities fixed income adrs derivatives futures foreign exchange trading if we ignore the session level message exchange that will be covered elsewhere we can use a simple example of an equity trade to show a typical message flow. the sell side sends an order to their broker for 10,000 ibm shares. the message will contain details of whether it is for the day, good till cancel, at the opening, immediate or cancel, fill or kill, good till crossing or good till date, what allocation details there may be, etc, etc. the broker will acknowledge this by sending back an order accept message as a form of acknowledgement referring to the unique sequence number of the previous message. the broker will then issue indication of interest messages to all connected institutions.  when an institution is interested in filling part or all of a trade they will in turn send an order message to the broker who will acknowledge with an order accept. when the broker executes the trade they will then confirm back to both customers using a filled execution report message. up to the point of execution parties can cancel using the appropriate message type. fix message formats the general format of a fix message is a standard header followed by the message body fields and terminated with a standard trailer. each message is constructed of a stream of  <tag>=<value> fields. fields within a message can be defined in any sequence with the relative position of a field within a message being of no consequence. it should be noted that there are some exceptions to this rule and these are defined in the protocol specification that can be downloaded from www.fixprotocol.org. the latest version of the specification is 4.2 and was introduced in march 2000. the following is an example of a quote for single security message: beginstring=fix4.2<soh> bodylen=222<soh> msgtype=s<soh> sendercompid=broker<soh> targetcompid=institution<soh> msgseqnum=251<soh> sendingtime=20000728-14:06:22<soh> header -----------------------------------------------   quoteid=xxx<soh> quotereqid=yyy<soh> symbol=aa<soh> maturymonthyear=199901<soh> strikeprice=25.00<soh> putorcall=1<soh> bidpx=5.00<soh> offerpx=5.25<soh> bidsize=10<soh> offersize=10<soh> body -----------------------------------------------   checksum=ked <soh> trailer notes: the example above has omitted a large number of non mandatory fields. the<soh> denotes the start of header control character and is used to mark the end of a message when following the checksum field. each field is also followed by the <soh> control character.  the example above has used the field names themselves for clarity, however in reality only their numeric tag equivalents would be sent and there would be no implicit carriage return line feeds at the end of each field. thus the transmitted stream would be as follows: 8=fix4.2<soh>9=222<soh>35=s<soh>49=broker<soh>56=institution <soh>34=251<soh>52=2000072814:06:22<soh>117=xxx<soh>131=yyy <soh>55=aa<soh>200=199901<soh>202=25.00<soh>201=1<soh>132=5.00 <soh>133=5.25<soh>134=10<soh>135=10<soh>10=ked<soh> what about fxml? in the years since the original fix protocol specifications were drawn up technology has moved on and in recent years the advent of xml (extensible markup language) has had a great impact on the definition of data transmission standards. to this end the fix steering committee set up a working group to investigate introducing an xml based version of the fix standards. this has now been released as a draft specification for fixml and is currently being piloted by a number of organisations. the current release is version 1.1 and is equivalent to the previous version of the fix standard, version 4.1. fixml is already having an impact on the fix standard itself, with version 4.2 introducing two new fields within the fix header block. the new fields, "xmldatalen" and "xmldata" facilitate the sending of fixml structure within the current standard. the only major difference in structure is the adherence to basic xml structure, for example the fix tag... strikeprice=25.00 ...would become, <strikeprice>25.00</strikeprice> the fixml message structures are defined by xml document type definitions (dtd's) and these can be downloaded from the fix website, www.fixprotocol.org. session management this section will give a high level overview of the session protocol. it is not meant to be exhaustive and exact details can be found in the fix protocol specification. a fix session is defined as a bi-directional stream of ordered messages between two parties within a continuous sequence number series. connecting parties must bi-laterally agree as to when sessions are to be started/stopped based upon individual system and time zone requirements. the fix session protocol is based on an optimistic model.  normal delivery of data is assumed (i.e. no communication level acknowledgment of individual messages) with errors in delivery identified by message sequence number gaps. a fix session is comprised of three parts: logon, message exchange and logout. establishing a fix connection involves three distinct operations: creation of a telecommunications level link, authentication/acceptance of the sender by the receiver and message synchronization (initialization).  the sequence of connection is as follows: the sender establishes a communication link with the receiver, eg leased line, internet or private network. the sender transmits a logon message.  the receiver authenticates the identity of the sender from information contained within the logon message. if the sender is successfully authenticated, the receiver responds with a confirming logon message. it is at this satge that encryption keys may be passed the sender may begin to send messages immediately following the logon confirmation message. after authentication, the sender and receiver must synchronize their messages through interrogation of the msgseqnum field before sending any queued or new messages.  a comparison of the msgseqnum in the logon message to the internally monitored next expected sequence number will indicate any message gaps. if gaps are detected then either party can send a resend request for any missing messages in the sequence. normal termination of the message exchange session will be completed via the exchange of logout messages. the heartbeat monitors the status of the communication link and identifies when the last of a string of messages was not received. when either end of a fix connection has not sent any data for a specified number of seconds, it will transmit a heartbeat message.  when either end of the connection has not received any data for a specified number of seconds, it will transmit a test request message.  if there is still no heartbeat message received after the same time then the connection should be considered lost and corrective action be initiated   what are the integration issues? the inherent flexibility of the fix standard means that there are a number of issues that need consideration up front before even considering the integration tasks although they are undoubtedly linked. as the fixml standard evolves and is officially released, organisations will have to decide whether to adopt the fix or fixml standard. significant dialogue must be entered into with other market participants with whom connection will be required. this will not only dictate the mode or modes of communications that need to be implemented but also what encryption needs to be carried out, for example public key or des. it is also necessary to consider which messages from the fix standard are going to be utilised. this is of course normal for any large standard covering many instruments and services. there is, however, an added complication with fix in that it has significant overlap with other standards relating to trade confirmation. many organisations will already have investment in oasys global, s.w.i.f.t., dtcc, trax, etc, for exactly this purpose and this must be considered. once these decisions have been made it will need to be decided whether to purchase an off the shelf "fix engine" that will handle all of the session management but may not provide a consistent user interface for the front office or to fix enable existing trading systems. whichever approach is taken the issues relating to integration with internal applications is somewhat more complicated than many other financial data standards. the reason being that not only does it have to integrate with the front office trading systems but also with the back office once trade execution is complete. the implementation of fix standards into the front office can be seen as the starting point for a fully automated transaction lifecycle and this is more fully explored in link to transaction automation.   where to find out more fix http://www.fixprotocol.org/ © iona technologies 2007 | contact us | legal terms & privacy policy | site map | site feedback | rss

Acceuil

suivante

iona financial solutions: fix information  Unsanity.org: Love Tropicana: The Fix for securityd Eatings Gobs ...  Forum CAC 40 Volumes anormaux au fix de vendredi sur les valeurs ...  FORTIS B FIX S.A. Sicav de droit belge Montagne du Parc, 3 1000 ...  FORTIS B FIX S.A. Sicav de droit belge Montagne du Parc, 3 1000 ...  FiX-Netze.com » Blog Archive » Un MacOS X pas comme les autres…  El-Fix a/s  Bored fix - Why should you be bored?  FIX  sugar fix recordings  The Fix Salon Arts & Entertainment  Celyatis, Incontinence, Slip filet Tena Fix, sante, confort et ...  Couche lavable Easy Fix  aLaide.com - Dictionnaire - Définition : Code-and-fix  Neo Fix XIV PSTwo - : FOXCHIP : Modification et Réparation des ...  Télécharger Fix My Registry 2.3 gratuite en française - Brothersoft.fr  Télécharger Dial-a-fix 0.57.7 Stable Full gratuite en française ...  Acheter Couche lavable Easy fix de popolini... avec eco-SAPIENS  Identity Theft Fraud Resource - Insurance & Repair Services ...  Descriptif du produit Tol-Fix de Tollens sur Batiproduits.com  Shop.WND.com - A WorldNetDaily Exclusive!  Thermal Fix Serum de Vichy  Chancelière Cabrio Fix Number One - Accessoires poussette ...  飞客数据恢复中心·硬盘RAID数据恢复{北京\上海…}电话:800-810-6696  Carrossiers indépendant au Canada - Fix Auto Carrossier  Logic-Immo : Immobilier Fix-saint-geneys  予定調整ツール:fix on  Emploi FIX Technical Sales (OMS, FIX, Algorithmic Trading Sales ...  Fix ATI pour Counter-Strike 1.3 - PC INpact  Winamp Updated to Fix Security Hole  Le blog du groupe ID-FIX - Espace Perso HitMuse de ID-FIX  Chancelière Cabrio Fix Athletic : enfant - article bébé à petit prix  Couverture Zewi-Fix Ciel 90 x 190/200 cm Zewi Bébé jou (Zewi Bébé jou)  Couverture Zewi-Fix Bleu 60 x 120 cm Zewi Bébé jou (Zewi Bébé jou)  Daily Funny Fix / Media  Télécharger Norton 2000 BIOS Test/Fix: version 1.0 [Freeware ...  BUG FIX définition BUG FIX  CRAOWIKI - Fix Fix  Télécharger Div Divx Fix Repair Joiner. Fixez le dossier endommagé ...  The Daily Fix  JScreenFix - Fix stuck pixels  Fix My Essay: Personal Statement and Admissions Essay Help ...  Why Search Sucks & You Won't Fix It The Way You Think  Fix It Tools - cheap power tools, discount air tools and hand tools  Fix-max, fix-wear, fixmax, se fixe partout!  XTREM'FIX - produits professionnels Bostik  PocketPCFreeware : Notification Clear Fix 1.2  Ultim'Fix Spray Coiffant Studio Line de L'Oréal Paris  East Bay SPCA  Porte-bidon, bottle fix kit de fixation pour porte bidon  engrais - Bio Fix Grotek  McKenzie can fix front-row woes - Rugby - Fox Sports  Permanent Fix for the Shmoo Group exploit - The OLD TechLifeBlogged  DIVFIX.MAXELINE.COM - Offical DivFix homepage - divx, avi, video ...  Firefox Bug 246078 Fix :: Mozilla Stuff :: JohnHaller.com  HOUSE OF FIX - LIMITED EDITION T-SHIRTS ! - Les news de Bikini Test  WinSock XP Fix 1.2  Détails constructifs. CYPE. FIX: Planchers Inclinés. Détails ...  tono fix you (Tono Monofónico fix you) (sonnerie.01net.com)  Quick-Fix Keychain  Garniture Mousse pour fix Standard: Acheter dans plus de 270 ...